AI · Automation · RPA · Better work
The systems work.
The stories deploy themselves.
Kris builds useful technology. Bot asks the question everyone postponed. Vrun applies scientific standards to household claims.
Open today’s incident ↓Three useful perspectives
Meet the people
inside the system.
The comic works because nobody carries the whole truth alone. Engineering optimism, machine literalism and scientific scepticism keep each other honest.
Kris
Engineer, automation practitioner and enthusiastic remover of friction. He sees systems as things that can be made clearer, faster and kinder—usually with one more integration.
Asks: “Can we automate it?”Bot
A friendly machine with no patience for euphemisms. Bot turns architecture, policy and workplace habits back into plain language—often at an inconveniently accurate moment.
Asks: “What happens in production?”Vrun
A biotechnology Master’s graduate with a scientist’s eye for evidence and an excellent detector for overconfident claims. At home, she is where elegant theory meets actual use.
Asks: “What does the evidence say?”Why these jokes land
Field notes from the gap between the demo and the day job.
Automation is still software.
Selectors, identities, data, dependencies and change all remain part of the product—even when the interface says “no code.”
AI fluency is not evidence.
A polished answer can still be ungrounded. Context, evaluation, permissions and human judgment make capability useful.
Humor is compressed learning.
A good punchline exposes the hidden assumption faster than a forty-slide governance deck—and is much easier to remember.
Open channel
Have a system with
a punchline hiding in it?
Send us the process, production surprise or automation truth your team cannot stop talking about.
hi@krisandbot.fyi ↗